Beth Tweddle
It’s time for the 343rd version of You Requested, The Gymternet Answered!
We apologize if we haven’t gotten to your query but, however we attempt to reply within the order wherein they have been obtained (except they’re tremendous related and have to be answered in a well timed method).
One thing you wish to know? Ask us anonymously by going by the contact type on the backside of the web page.
Fascinated by how Laurie Hernandez was (incorrectly) being touted as a bars and ground specialist forward of Rio, has there ever been an elite gymnast, significantly within the three-up three-count period, who may precisely be described as such? It looks as if such an odd mixture of specialties.
Each time I noticed NBC calling her the bars/ground specialist I might die somewhat inside…it was SO OBVIOUS that beam was her factor?! I’ve NO thought the place they received that and located it particularly humorous when she didn’t do bars in Rio AND received a beam medal. I believe I yelled about this quite a bit on Twitter and in my reside weblog, like, don’t take heed to them! It’s not true!
To reply your query, I believe Beth Tweddle might be most notable as a bars and ground specialist, particularly below the open-ended code…and I’m additionally going to say Brenna Dowell and Elizabeth Worth match rather well into this description. It’s undoubtedly not a typical mixture for a specialist, however I believe all three are comparable in that they have been all extra “highly effective” bar employees with large releases and many amplitude of their swing, and that energy additionally translated on ground (and vault for Dowell and Worth).
What is occurring with Charlotte Sales space? She positioned 4th on bars on the English Championships however doesn’t have an FIG license?
Sales space determined that since she is eligible to have UK citizenship, she wished to coach within the nation for a bit and see how issues go when it comes to probably altering her nationality with the FIG. It gave the impression of she was simply taking part in round with the thought at first and hadn’t absolutely dedicated to the nation change course of, so she nonetheless had an lively FIG license for the USA, however I believe as soon as the British group had so many accidents and it grew to become clear that she may probably be an possibility for the Olympic group, she filed for a nation change, which the U.S. accepted efficient instantly, and she or he is now eligible to compete internationally as a member of the British squad. She in the end ended up incomes one of many reserve spots for the British group in Paris this summer time, which was fairly surprising primarily based on how issues appeared when she first began her journey, however it was wonderful to look at her go to date!
How does the reserve system work for the Olympics?
It relies on how the athlete who’s being changed qualifies, however typically there are ‘alternates’ from every qualification course of sitting in wait for somebody to withdraw. For instance, if somebody who certified by way of the all-around at world championships needed to withdraw, the athlete who’s next-in-line primarily based on the all-around rankings would get that spot. But when somebody who certified by vault on the equipment world cup collection withdrew, the next-highest-ranked athlete would earn the spot, and if somebody who certified by a continental championship competitors withdrew, the reserve athlete can be chosen from that particular continental meet…and so forth!
Is there one thing about gymnastics that inherently stunts or postpones progress in athletes, or is it simply that coaches imagine those that are naturally smaller are usually one of the best within the sport and lower athletes who don’t meet their (ridiculous) bodily requirements as soon as they turn out to be youngsters?
I really feel like up to now it was virtually fully the latter, however now that we’re seeing increasingly more gymnasts competing into their 20s and 30s in additional developed “grown” our bodies in addition to extra physique sorts turning into the norm throughout the sport in comparison with the old-school “pixie” sort, we’re not seeing the puberty delay as a lot or as typically as we did in earlier a long time, the place developed athletes have been pressured to retire or stored out of the elite ranges fully. There are nonetheless athletes who enter the senior ranges pre-puberty, so it may very well be that there are only a lot of coaches who imagine that the tiny youngsters who keep undeveloped will make one of the best elite gymnasts, or it may very well be that the late bloomers are likely to last more within the sport than those that undergo puberty earlier and discover it troublesome to transition their abilities and routines in additional developed our bodies. However I do assume athletes who’re extra developed when it comes to their musculature are higher suited to the issue necessities within the sport proper now, so no less than those that do develop later are seeing that puberty doesn’t should imply retirement or that they’ll’t do the identical ranges of problem they have been doing in smaller our bodies.
Why did Jordyn Wieber get to compete on the American Cup in 2009 when she was solely 13?
The American Cup didn’t turn out to be a FIG-sponsored world cup till 2011. As a FIG world cup, the organizers needed to invite gymnasts primarily based on their rating on the earlier yr’s world championships, however with out that designation, the organizers have been basically free to do no matter they wished, and although they often caught with the identical format and invited solely senior elites, sometimes we noticed some shake-ups, like an equipment format as an alternative of an all-around format in 2005, after which after all an invitation being prolonged to the very junior Wieber in 2009.
How a lot is flexibility one thing that may be skilled and discovered versus one thing your physique can or can’t do? I’ve all the time puzzled this for gymnasts who’ve hassle hitting 180. Is flexibility not prioritized, or is it doable some gymnast’s our bodies can’t bodily hit a full break up?
Flexibility is unquestionably one thing you may work on, however each physique has its limits. There are people who find themselves simply naturally extra versatile than others, so somebody may very well be one of the best gymnast on the earth however not have pure flexibility and can actually should work on hitting 180 more durable than they should work on doing tremendous troublesome tumbling or bar releases! It’s additionally true that the extra muscular an individual is, the more durable flexibility turns into…I typically see actually versatile juniors achieve extra muscle mass as they develop up and so they lose a few of that flexibility that after got here a lot simpler.
There’s additionally a distinction between static and dynamic flexibility. I can do a 180 break up on the bottom however can barely get to 120 within the air…except I’m on a trampoline after which I can get fairly a bit extra however nonetheless to not 180. I believe there are undoubtedly numerous gymnasts who’ve higher static flexibility, so doing a break up on the ground is simple however hitting 180 within the air shouldn’t be. However then on the opposite facet are the gymnasts who’re tremendous highly effective, and they won’t have full splits on the ground, however they’ll use their energy to form of power that 180 (or near it) within the air, that means they’ve higher dynamic flexibility. I believe Alicia Sacramone and Aly Raisman are good examples of gymnasts with good dynamic flexibility…I believe at one level one among them confirmed an image of them making an attempt to do a break up and so they weren’t near a full break up on the bottom. I used to be like HOW hahaha…however then they’ll bounce into one within the air.
So principally all gymnasts are placing numerous effort and time into coaching 180 splits within the air, however it undoubtedly doesn’t come as naturally for some…and I’d say these gymnasts are in all probability working even more durable at that 180 line than those that have flexibility come extra simply to them!
Do you assume the U.S. ladies will begin sporting unitards at competitions?
I doubt it. Many of the U.S. gymnasts have been truly requested on the press conferences at nationals a few years in the past in the event that they would like unitards and so they just about all mentioned that whereas they respect the German ladies for taking this step, they felt it wouldn’t be comfy making the change themselves. The overwhelming opinion was that they have been merely used to what most individuals take into account the “competitors” leo, in order that they most well-liked to stay with what they knew. I don’t assume it’s even a consolation factor, because the sleeveless leos are typically extra bodily comfy than the lengthy sleeves, however somewhat a convention or behavior that they’d been competing in since childhood. Perhaps if nearly all of the U.S. athletes have been like “we demand this transformation” the USAG ladies’s program must cave, however since the entire athletes individually appeared fairly in opposition to it, I don’t see it taking place, no less than on the nationwide group. However possibly we’ll see a number of who’re into it present up at national-level meets sporting unitards sooner or later?
Why are there totally different rankings for circle parts relying on whether or not they’re in reverse grip or L grip (like an Endo being a C however Endo in L grip being a D), however not for launch strikes? Wouldn’t it’s more durable to generate peak and rotation when you swing right into a Jaeger from L grip somewhat than reverse grip?
The grip is unrelated to the discharge and is definitely a part of the swinging component. Most gymnasts do a backward big with a half flip to both reverse grip (normally known as a blind change) or to L grip (a Higgins roll) because the ability earlier than the Jaeger. Each of those are value a B…despite the fact that the Higgins roll is unquestionably a bit tougher than your typical blind change, with pirouettes capped, it doesn’t make sense to bump this as much as a C when there are tougher L grip parts to account for. Whether or not a gymnast does a blind change or a Higgins roll right into a Jaeger, the worth is identical.
Nevertheless, if the gymnast did a Higgins roll after which carried out a entrance big in L grip after which did a Jaeger, that entrance big in L grip can be value a C, in order that’s the place the additional problem would are available in. Most don’t do that, although, as a result of connecting a C component to a Jaeger isn’t value something in CV, and most high bar employees received’t be counting C parts of their routines, so it’s simply form of pointless to do both this Higgins roll to entrance big in L grip to Jaeger or only a straight up Higgins roll to Jaeger. We actually solely see the Higgins roll for gymnasts going into entrance L grip pirouette sequences (so like, the Chinese language).
Why are some coaches comparatively unscathed within the public eye with none repercussions following complaints in opposition to them? In recent times, Mary Lee Tracy and Kim Zmeskal have had many former athletes from varied time intervals stand in opposition to them and file complaints…however nothing got here of it. Former Utah gymnast Hailee Hoffman got here ahead and mentioned she reported Mary Wright, however wasn’t certain if SafeSport would “settle for” her criticism. Does this imply the coaches weren’t formally investigated or discovered responsible?
I believe the very first thing right here is that SafeSport doesn’t appear to prioritize emotional and even typically bodily abuse, except it’s critical or simple to show (by ‘critical’ I imply hitting or pushing an athlete versus making them prepare on an harm, which remains to be very critical and needs to be thought-about bodily abuse however is sadly nonetheless thought-about ‘acceptable’ in soooo many circumstances). From my very own expertise listening to athletes and fogeys discuss these sorts of ‘grey space’ circumstances, they have an inclination to get pushed again for a yr or extra, and by then, most of those that have made complaints not have the time or power to attend hearings (particularly when the hearings are rescheduled time and again, largely as a result of SafeSport is severely understaffed and normally prioritizes sexual abuse or these ‘critical’ bodily abuse that may be simply confirmed).
A gymnast coming ahead and saying “my coach yelled at me and made me prepare on a damaged foot” is clearly very critical and claims like these ought to all the time be investigated completely, but when there’s no proof other than the gymnast’s phrase, sadly there isn’t very a lot that may be carried out and these sorts of complaints are usually pushed again. SafeSport would have completely accepted Hoffman’s criticism however I can see how the investigation wouldn’t flip something up, particularly since her criticism got here years after her abuse occurred. Within the case of Maggie Haney, then again, there was fairly robust proof in opposition to her (I imagine each video and textual content messages along with the massive variety of gymnasts and fogeys who got here ahead), so regardless of being on the decrease finish of the precedence spectrum, it was simple for investigators to come back to a conclusion…and even that case took years to place in movement, after which one other yr or so to analyze and go to a listening to.
From what I’d heard, there was an ongoing investigation into Tracy’s conduct, however it’s been within the works for no less than a yr primarily based on the data I’ve, so I can see this as one which’s simply been pushed again because of SafeSport’s priorities. I additionally know that a lot of the gymnasts who got here ahead about Zmeskal did NOT file SafeSport complaints…there could have been somebody who did however I talked to 2 athletes on the time who mentioned they felt no must have her formally investigated and have been simply sharing their experiences to assist others who’ve been in that state of affairs. I believe there are undoubtedly many cases like this, the place a gymnast will discuss abuse they’ve suffered however not wish to transfer ahead with one thing extra official, which I perceive as somebody who has been in the same state of affairs and selected to not press fees.
I perceive triaging abuse circumstances to prioritize probably the most critical offenders, particularly when SafeSport doesn’t have the sources to deal with each criticism, however I additionally assume the seemingly much less critical circumstances are typically simply as – if no more – harmful, as coaches are in a position to get away with emotional and bodily abuse that’s so dangerous for years with out anybody paying consideration, and I want there was a strategy to deal with all circumstances as high precedence. Till that occurs, I believe we will all imagine those that come ahead and share their tales within the hope that public naming and shaming will maintain mother and father from sending their youngsters to abusive coaches, gyms, faculty applications, and so forth.
Up to now, you wrote extensively about Kim Zmeskal and Maggie Haney exhibiting them in a constructive gentle, giving them vital constructive press earlier than their abuse was uncovered. Do you are feeling you shouldn’t have spoken/written with such authority, understanding what you now know? Are you going to be extra cautious about writing in regards to the tradition of a health club sooner or later, while you have no idea the reality of the state of affairs?
I a million % don’t assume I ought to have written about these or any coaches with any authority, and I really don’t perceive how I believed my private opinions of them as folks may colour my total view of who they have been as coaches. A very powerful factor I’ve discovered associated to discussing gymnastics – or sports activities generally – over the previous eight years is that I might imagine I do know a coach however I’ve by no means been within the health club with them as an athlete and I due to this fact have completely zero authority to share my opinion of a coach or to debate the tradition of a gymnastics program.
It’s been an odd journey, as a result of I’ve all the time tended to take folks at face worth and I assume that if somebody is very nice or pleasant or welcoming or humorous or charming, I’ve no motive to be suspicious of them. That was in all probability actually naive on my half, and I’ve since had different experiences in my private life which have modified my worldview fully, however how somebody presents in public doesn’t imply that’s who they’re, and so many individuals are sadly monsters when nobody is wanting. I’d so typically see coaches at competitions or in movies on the health club the place they’d be smiling and telling jokes, their gymnasts can be laughing, the entire vibe would look actually relaxed and enjoyable – so if somebody requested me if I believed somebody like this was a great coach, I’d say sure with out hesitation. They’re nice and their athletes clearly love them, why would I even query it? Penning this simply now could be form of mind-blowing as a result of I don’t even know the way I wouldn’t query it at this stage, however previous to 2016 – and even somewhat after 2016 – I simply didn’t anticipate somebody may very well be so wildly totally different behind closed doorways and so I by no means even actually thought-about it till athletes began coming ahead.
I additionally assume there have been so many coaches who have been terrible in public, so seeing somebody like Zmeskal or Haney was refreshing and I trusted that they have been ‘good.’ However it really is very easy to be fooled, and I believe among the most harmful coaches are those everybody loves and who’ve actually good public reputations, as a result of if somebody comes ahead with a narrative of abuse by the hands of those folks, they’re far much less prone to be believed. I personally have skilled this by the hands of one among a majority of these coaches, somebody I used to be as soon as pleasant with however who turned on me and received fairly scary in a single interplay, however once I expressed my issues, different journalists advised me I used to be “overreacting” and that this coach was fairly improbable, truly. I as soon as additionally had that opinion, so naturally I questioned myself and my emotions about her and the state of affairs, and reasoned that they have been in all probability proper and that I used to be the issue. This was in 2015, earlier than any tales of abuse inside USAG and across the globe have been broadly public, however I later realized that this similar actual factor occurred with the quantity of people that defended Larry Nassar once we first noticed experiences of his abuse – together with a few of his victims at first! – as a result of he was so ‘good’ and publicly beloved as a uncommon constructive gentle inside a tricky sport. He couldn’t probably have carried out something remotely near what athletes have been alleging!
It’s really easy to make these judgment calls while you assume your private perspective is the ‘right’ perspective. I don’t assume I ever even consciously thought that my perspective about anybody was ‘right’ however simply somewhat didn’t even query my perspective a few coach till another person mentioned one thing to vary it. My adverse expertise with a coach who was as soon as so pleasant to me was stunning, and but this didn’t change how I felt about folks generally, and I used to be repeatedly shocked each time I came upon one thing horrible about one other coach I as soon as thought-about to be ‘good.’ Once I first learn allegations about Zmeskal’s abusive teaching, I used to be shocked. And I skilled that many times with each different coach I as soon as thought was ‘good’ however was later outed as not a lot. I believed the allegations each time, and can by no means query an athlete who comes ahead, however till these allegations got here out about each coach, I continued to imagine within the ‘good’ I skilled and if somebody have been to ask me if I believed so-and-so was a ‘good’ coach, I’d proceed to say sure till confirmed in any other case, and didn’t actually see the hurt in sharing my opinion about an individual primarily based on my experiences with them.
Now, I’m hesitant to share private experiences with any grownup who has authority throughout the sport as a result of I don’t even wish to subtly recommend that somebody is ‘good’ if there may be even the tiniest likelihood that an athlete is struggling below their management. It’s unhappy in a manner, as I used to worth lots of the relationships I had with folks I admired on this sport, however it’s additionally essential to separate myself and my experiences with coaches from how somebody behaves as a coach. I don’t wish to imagine everyone seems to be inherently not good, and I truly nonetheless don’t imagine that, however I believe I’m rather more cautious about how I promote them and I attempt to follow sharing solely what athletes say about their experiences somewhat than publicizing my opinions.
Even then, it’s such a high quality line! I as soon as spent a full day within the health club and at dinner with a number of athletes, their households, and different coaches who have been all so enamored with their head coach, somebody I additionally discovered so humorous and endearing. By this time, about two years post-Nassar, I used to be extra leery of coaches or different authority figures and their public personas, however I believed it was ‘protected’ to debate this coach from the angle of everybody else round her, and so I fortunately printed details about this go to and what I noticed and heard. In fact, solely a few years later each single one of many folks I frolicked with got here ahead with horror tales, issues that have been taking place throughout the time I spent with them however that have been so normalized, nobody actually acknowledged what a poisonous setting it was on the time (and in the event that they did, they stored silent about it). I had publicly mentioned what a enjoyable and wholesome state of affairs this was, primarily based zero % by myself experiences and 100% on the experiences of those that lived it each single day. I actually felt like I used to be so cautious on this state of affairs, and but right here we have been as soon as once more, and I felt so responsible for not being extra cautious with how I mentioned the coach, the health club, and the tradition.
I really feel like probably the most accountable factor to do at this level is to not focus on coaches, applications, or cultures at ALL. Sure, I’d like to share a quote from somebody like Simone Biles speaking about how unbelievable her coaches have been in serving to her overcome her experiences in 2021, including precisely zero of my very own context or perception, however can I do that when different athletes have mentioned their very own adverse experiences with these similar coaches? What if different athletes are struggling in silence proper now? Does each quote or story a few coach have to be asterisked with a observe that this is just one athlete’s expertise? I really feel like that’s overkill, and most of the people now know that one particular person’s expertise shouldn’t be everybody’s expertise, however I’d nonetheless really feel accountable for selling a coach as ‘good’ once they probably haven’t been ‘good’ for everybody, and so I are likely to not discuss coaches in any respect outdoors of details and figures.
Once more, that is probably an excessive manner to consider the whole lot, however I by no means once more wish to be accountable for spreading constructive depictions of conditions that would privately be something however, and I wish to take possession if I do overtly reward a coach or one other particular person in energy and ensure that it’s very clear when one thing I share is predicated solely on my experiences. I went from not even contemplating this when speaking about gymnastics to being so hyperaware of how my opinions may have an effect on different folks, and possibly now I overthink issues too a lot, however in the end it was a essential lesson and I might somewhat be overly cautious than enable my private experiences to outline folks or conditions of which I’ve solely a minuscule understanding.
Have a query? Ask under! Keep in mind that the shape straight under this line is for questions; to remark, maintain scrolling to the underside of the web page. We don’t reply questions on group predictions nor questions that ask “what do you consider [insert gymnast here]?”
Article by Lauren Hopkins
